View article at its original site
Showing comments 1—6 of 6
Posted 10/28/09 11:11 AM C00kieM0nster Oxnard, CA | Finally!! It's good to see the (un-)constitutionality of this nonsense being openly discussed.
ICC is the most abused clause in the Constitution. Since insurance is mostly bought and sold within state boundaries, it should not even apply. Unless I am missing something....oh yeah my crack pipe, and a rule bending machine. This is my line in the sand. I hope they don't force me to draw it, but I flatly refuse their coercion. |
Posted 10/28/09 12:27 PM ifthenwouldi Canton, NC | I second your "Finally!" This is the first discussion I've seen of this in the national (print) media. |
Posted 10/28/09 1:46 PM WinstonSmith1984 Oceania, United Kingdom | I third that ... at least we know there are some decent people paying attention and that the Constitution means something to someone. |
Posted 10/29/09 11:33 AM shooter348 Buffalo, WY | It would be nice if this opened the door to questioning the constitutionality of all of the federal governments actions.
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." Thomas Jefferson |
Posted 10/29/09 7:01 PM sweetliberty San Rafael, CA | Yay! Come on, media! More of this! :) |
Posted 10/30/09 12:50 AM Bohemian Reno, NV | This gives me immense hope! Our political activity, and that of liberty-loving person everywhere is having an effect! Huzzah! |
You must be a member to post comments. [Become a member]
