View article at its original site


Showing comments 1—9 of 9  

Posted 11/24/08 07:24 AM

edmyster81
Buffalo, NY
More "change" America will have to pay for? No thanks.

Posted 11/24/08 08:00 AM

smashysmashy
dover, NH
Here is an excerpt from the Obama 2008 Dictionary

Change
–adjective
1. identical with what is about to be or has just been mentioned: This street is the change one we were on yesterday.
2. being one or identical though having different names, aspects, etc.: These are the change rules though differently worded.
3. agreeing in kind, amount, etc.; corresponding: two boxes of the change dimensions.
4. unchanged in character, condition, etc.: It's the change town after all these years.


Posted 11/24/08 08:22 AM

FillBax
Linwood, PA
FTA (Last Paragraph):
"The 1930s recession became the Great Depression because policymakers didn't take the necessary actions. Nobody wants to make that mistake this time around," said Jared Bernstein, a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute who has been advising Democrats. "Is there a possibility that we could overshoot? Of course. But from what I've seen, the danger is not doing enough." LOL

They took plenty of action in the 30s that's why the depression lasted so long. How can these people be so clueless? Their thought process must be: If easy money caused this mess, than easy money can fix it!

Posted 11/24/08 09:57 AM

sweetliberty
San Rafael, CA
How is handing out Monopoly money going to stimulate anything besides riots?

Posted 11/24/08 10:47 AM

ifc69
Midland, MI
For once congress is listening to it's constituents. Unfortunately they are the same constituents that were saying the government should spend the $850 billion on them instead of the banks.

Serenity now!!!

Posted 11/24/08 7:45 PM

Restore America
fairfield , IA
I think I'm going to vomit...

Posted 11/24/08 10:03 PM

Mikebuh
North Smithfield, RI
Is this a joke?

Posted 11/25/08 07:34 AM

LizLiz
Brooklyn(or Cresco,PA!) , NY
bad dream.... bad dream.... bad dream.... *taps ruby(silver) slippers together*

Posted 12/09/08 1:30 PM

jbo5112
Kansas City, MO
"It would also be one of the biggest public spending programs aimed at jolting the economy since President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal."

I thought the New Deal was $500 billion, which (assuming my math is correct) is less than $700 billion.

"In an interview, Schumer said the nation is on the brink of the same kind of deflationary spiral that pushed down prices, closed businesses and obliterated jobs during the Great Depression.

"'The economy is in worse shape than people think,' Schumer said. 'The safest thing is to do anything you can to avoid deflation.'"

Well, if avoiding deflation is something we must do anything we can to avoid, then we're on the right track. Currently CPI changes over the last 3 months show 7% inflation. However, I don't think double-digit inflation is good for double-digit unemployment.

"Washington also could overshoot its target, sparking rampant inflation when the economy recovers. Or the money could be poorly directed and fail to efficiently stimulate the economy."

I think the could ship has long set sail.





You must be a member to post comments.  [Become a member]

Locations of visitors to this page






"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson





Campaign for Liberty is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization which neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office and claims no
responsibility for the actions of individuals or groups of individuals who use the Campaign for Liberty logo or name or who may claim to act as
representatives of the Campaign for Liberty without prior written consent of the Campaign for Liberty. [?]