Campaign For Liberty: mirand sharma

mirand sharma
Assistant State Coordinator
Location: Celebration, FL
Last login: 07/01/11
RSS feed

I cannot get the message of Freedom as articulated by the Constitution and announced by Dr. Paul out of my mind and heart. 

I will be a citizen solder defending our Constitutional Republic. 

 

I am also a full time practicing Emergency Medicine physician.

 

No government or state has a higher claim to my life or that of my family's than I and my family do.

 

The plant of Liberty has taken strong roots in me.




mirand sharma's weblog


Bookmark and Share
Posted by mirand sharma on 10/05/10
Last updated 10/07/10






Categories: Health Freedom, Action Item, Video
Tags: Obamacare, Amendment 9, FLORIDA HEALTHCARE FREEDOM ACT, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by mirand sharma on 07/31/10
Last updated 07/31/10




Tags:

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by mirand sharma on 04/11/10


I've been reading several email  regarding the situation of Obamacare:  
Some emails mention the  need for a new constitutional amendment.  This is incorrect, in my humble opinion. The Constitution already has the the ninth and tenth amendments that prohibit Obamacare. Even if WE THE PEOPLE pass a new amendment, what makes you think the Federal Government will obey this new amendment when they are ignoring others?
Other emails mention the revolution in 2010 to repeal and replace. Why do we need to repeal something using Constitutional methods (like voting) for something that is already unconstitutional.  If Congress and the President passed legislation that mandated us to buy a $1000.00 of band-aids a month per person to keep us safe, would we then say to ourselves that we'll have to wait until the next election to elect politicians to repeal and replace this band-aid law?   Hell no!  We would simply ignore the law. 
If a robber armed with a knife comes to rob you but he didn't know you have a gun for self-defense, would you say to that robber, Hey I have an idea. Why don't we go to court in front of a judge  in a court of law to mediate this discrepancy?   Hell no again.  You would retain the right to defend yourself and shoot the robber.  
Finally, other emails have mentioned that the States, as several states are doing, are suing the Federal Government.  Would you say to that robber as he is threatening you with a knife, I'm going to sue you!  Hell no again!!  
So why are we "threatening" the federal government's unconstitutional power grab with a Constitutional Amendment,  a Constitutional law suit, or Constitutional election?    
Why is the Federal government allowed to disregard the Constitution yet we are obligated to follow it?  And how do we rectify the methods of fighting the unconstitutional Obamacare with effective results while taking the higher road in maintaing our fidelity to the Constitution? After all, an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, so wouldn't an unconstitutional act for an unconstitutional act make the whole system of government blind?
My answer is this (not mine originally, I'm just a messenger):  nullification. When the State of Florida agreed to enter the union of States in 1845,  WE THE PEOPLE of Florida with the general legislative assembly agreed to abide by the Constitution as did the Federal Government.  Since the Federal government is seceding from the compact called the Constitution, WE THE PEOPLE  of the state of Florida can nullify and refuse to follow the unconstitutional law.  Putting it quite simply, the 16,500 armed IRS agents cannot force 19,000,000 Florida citizens to follow an unjust law.  
Nullification is, in my opinion, the answer, because the bottom line is that government gets its power from perceived legitimacy, and Obamacare is not legitimate.  Revolutions begin in the minds and hearts of men and women, one person at a time.  
We need to get as many people, political parties (Republican, Tea, and otherwise, including those willing Democrats), and  elected officials in the State of Florida to accept and internalize this idea by whatever activism each one of us know how to do. Inevitably, critical mass will be reached where unconstitutional power will simply lose its effect and die.  
Please see the video link below (5 min):  Mr. Jack Hunter says it very well, although I disagree that his calling nullification the nuclear option is not correct.  It is Obamacare than mandates Florida citizens to purchase approved insurance by the threat of an armed IRS agent that is the nuclear option.  Nullification is simply putting out the nuclear fire. 





Categories: Law, Health Freedom, US Constitution, Executive Power, Federal Legislation, History, Revolution, State Legislation, Video
Tags:

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by mirand sharma on 01/29/10
Last updated 01/29/10


It was one  year ago this month that I joined my local county Republican party. (I can't believe I did this being that George Bush was president for 8 years!)  I didn't show up with my Ron Paul Audit the Fed T-shirt proclaiming a non-interventionist foreign policy. Rather, I sat quietly and listened. I attended the required 3 general meetings and joined the executive party.  There were two other Ron Paul people, including the Campaign for Liberty state committee man Mark Cross. 

The Florida Campaign for Liberty has as part of its legislative agenda a campaign to support 3 pieces of legislation in  the Florida legislature: the Florida Firearms Freedom Act, the Florida Health Care Freedom Act, and the Florida 10th Amendment Resolution. (You can learn more about this legislation at flfreedom.org) I had the privilege of volunteering to write  our executive committee resolutions in support of this legislation.  In my presentation to the general meeting, I mentioned how not just Democrats but Republicans have allowed the Federal government to usurp state powers.  It is my hope that  my actions will inspire other county executive committees to create and pass similar resolutions. After all, it is WE THE PEOPLE who are the government and make up the Republican party. 

And if there are any Tea Party executive committee members who read this, I hope this inspires you as well. 

 

By the way, the resolutions passed unanimously. I'm particularly proud of articulating the language of the Constitution.  Personally speaking, I've come a long way from the spring of 2008 when I began to take notice of Dr. Paul.  You can see the resolutions below:

 

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

 

A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT   THE FLORIDA FIREARMS FREEDOM ACT  AS INTRODUCED INTO THE FLORIDA STATE LEGISLATURE:  HOUSE  HB 21 AND  SENATE SB 98

 

WHEREAS, the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States proclaims: "A Well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." And 

 

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment proclaims: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the  Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," defines the scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more, and 

 

WHEREAS, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the Federal Government may not usurp;

 

WHEREAS, the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States proclaims:

 " The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people,"

 

WHEREAS the possession  of firearms manufactured within the State of Florida and used within the borders of Florida is a right  not subject to any federal laws regulating interstate commerce, 

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Osceola County 

Republican Executive Committee:

 

1)  Supports in its entirety  the Florida Freedom Firearms Act, House HB 21 and Senate SB 98,

 

2) And prohibits the federal government from using its interstate regulatory authority, as delegated to it by Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution,  to regulate the intrastate  possession and use of firearms manufactured within the state of Florida.

 

George Jackow---Chairman 

Mark Cross---State Committeeman 

Sherry Goad---State Committeewoman 

Frank Attkisson---Vice-Chairman 

Michael Neal---Secretary 

Berniece Matthews---Treasurer

 

 

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

 

A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT THE FLORIDA HEALTHCARE FREEDOM ACT  AS INTRODUCED INTO THE FLORIDA STATE LEGISLATURE:  HOUSE  HJR 37 AND  SENATE SJR 72

 

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment proclaims: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the  Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," defines the scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more, and 

 

WHEREAS, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the Federal Government may not usurp;

 

WHEREAS, the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States proclaims: 

" The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people,"

 

WHEREAS the prohibition or forced mandates of private contracts between individuals and businesses regarding the delivery of health care related products and services is not a delegated power to the Federal government by the Constitution, 

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Osceola County 

Republican Executive Committee:

 

1)  Supports in its entirety  the Florida Health Care Freedom Act , House HJR 37 and Senate SJR 72,

 

2) And demands all compulsory federal legislation that directs Florida citizens to comply under threat of civil  penalties or sanctions, or requires the Florida state government to pass legislation or lose federal funding, be prohibited or repealed. 

 

3)  We proclaim that the exercising of health care decisions is a right retained by the State of Florida and the people.  

 

George Jackow---Chairman 

Mark Cross---State Committeeman 

Sherry Goad---State Committeewoman 

Frank Attkisson---Vice-Chairman 

Michael Neal---Secretary 

Berniece Matthews---Treasurer

 

 

OSCEOLA COUNTY REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

 

A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT  FLORIDA'S 10TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AS INTRODUCED INTO THE  FLORIDA STATE LEGISLATURE: HM 19 AND  SM96

 

 

 

 

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States proclaims: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the  Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," and 

 

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more, and 

 

WHEREAS, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the Federal Government may not usurp;

 

WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States begins: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,"  and many current federal laws are in direct violation of the Tenth Amendment;

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Osceola County 

Republican Executive Committee:

 

1)  Supports in its entirety  House HM19 and Senate SM96,  the Florida 10th Amendment Resolution,

 

2) And demands all compulsory federal legislation that directs Florida citizens to comply under threat of civil  penalties or sanctions, or requires the Florida state government to pass legislation or lose federal funding, be prohibited or repealed. 

 

George Jackow---Chairman 

Mark Cross---State Committeeman 

Sherry Goad---State Committeewoman 

Frank Attkisson---Vice-Chairman 

Michael Neal---Secretary 

Berniece Matthews---Treasurer

 





Categories: Health Freedom, Republican Party
Tags: States Rights, 10th amendment, Firearms Freedom

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by mirand sharma on 05/18/09


I am not a formally trained economist. I am an emergency room physician.  But what does this have to do with the Federal Reserve?


Consider this:  You have an appointment with your doctor where you describe a complain of chest pain. You doctor then tell syou that you immediately need emergency bypass cardiac surgery.  Your doctor hasn't performed any test. He hasn't tried any medicinal treatment. He simply concludes that the surgery is needed. Would you question the authority of you doctor? Would you feel the least bit suspicious that your doctor has made this conclusion based on  your history alone?  Not even an EKG?
Mr.  Cooley, don't tell me that the Federal Reserve needs to allocate tax payer money simply based on the assertion that we the people need our monetary policy controlled in secret by a few individuals as smart as Greespan and Bernanke? You elitist view that a secret private bank (yes, the Federal Reserve is a private bank Mr. Cooley, but maybe you forgot to mention that) can manipulate the value of my hard earned money is absurd and laughable. I reject you opinion. Moreover, perhaps you forgot about the most important document of the United States of America:  The  Constitution. Nowhere in the  Constitution is the federal reserve act allowed. Congress is supposed to control the money supply and it's allocation, not the private Federal Reserve.  But this will politicize the money supply you say?  Ridiculous!!  There was a time in this country where $20.00 represented an ounce of gold. Now, an ounce of gold is worth about a $1000.00.  The Federal Reserve has decimated the US dollar through its inflation tendencies, making today's US dollar worth only about 4 cents of the dollar in 1913, the year the federal reserve system was enacted. 
This fact alone challenges any  supposed successes of the Fed. 
The Federal Reserve keeps politics out of the monetary policy? Again, absurd.  The central bank exists only to allow the government to create deficit spending for politicians' pet projects. The Congress is addicted to spending, and the Federal Reserve in the drug pusher.  When the US dollar crumbles under it own unsustainable debt, it the the Federal Reserve that should be first and foremost to blame. Second to blame will be the pundits such as your self, whose "authority" on the subject matter helps propagate a faulty monetary policy thereby bankrupting and ruining our Constitutional Republic. 
One more thing, Mr. Cooley:  The operating room awaits you.
Sincerely,
Mirand R Sharma MD FACEP





Categories: Finance, US Constitution, Monetary Policy
Tags:

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]


Recent Entries

VOTE OUT THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT OBAMACARE SUPPORTERS
Florida's HR 1207 Wall of Shame
Obamacare, logic, nullification, and a winning strategy. No need for new amendments, law suits, and "repeal and replace."
A political neophyte now writing resolutions for my REC
A respone to Mr. Cooley regarding the Federal Reserve
CONGRESSIONAL QUESTIONS AND MUSICAL RON PAUL TRIBUTE

Entries mirand sharma recommends

Pay No Attention to the Fed Behind the Curtain      by Anthony Gregory


mirand sharma's contacts

Showing contacts 1—10 of 24

View all of mirand sharma's contacts


LaurieBluedorn


confederate rebel


DanielFCook


tigerravenous


Rariden


Octavian092363


joeFL


mybug67


jorus


BBMoake











Disclaimer: This website has moved. Please visit campaignforliberty.org






Campaign for Liberty is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization which neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office and claims no
responsibility for the actions of individuals or groups of individuals who use the Campaign for Liberty logo or name or who may claim to act as
representatives of the Campaign for Liberty without prior written consent of the Campaign for Liberty. [?]