crzyredhead's weblog
This is a direct copy from a note I put up on face book, it seemd that this would be kind of helpful to people on the campaign too
So, when I walked downstairs at around 11:45 to see that come January 20th we're going to have President Barack Obama, my initial reaction was anger. Angry at how blind the country could be, angry about the fact that Ron Paul could've been picked as the opposing candidate and won by a landslide, and angry about people not doing research outside of the mainstream media.
Then it dawned on me, I have no reason to be angry at any of you who voted for Obama. Now, I could be off, but my assessment of the voting situation was this:
You had John McCain, who, while a decent person, was pretty much just going to extend the failed economics we've had for the last century or so. No one wants that, and most people put the entire blame on George Bush out of anger. George Bush just happened to be the president when the flaws of the system showed their head. (and he definately didn't help matters with that bailout and other economical and foreign decisions). But for the most part, people understood that something was wrong with the system, they just didn't realize how deep-rooted and far back it started.
Then you have Barack Obama. Through the man's many speeches and the media coverage of him, it became evident that he was going to bring change. What kind of change? Well, no one seemed to agree on that but the fact was that he was going to bring change. To you people who voted for Obama on the basis of having change, I applaud you.
However, by the mans own admission (and evidenced by the many other statements he's made in the past) he is deeply influenced by his family's political values. What the media tried to play off and tried very hard to present as preposterous, the mans family has a history of Marxism and he himself is deeply affected by that history. I know I pretty much lost half of you there, but that doesn't change the trueness of the statement. The evidence I've seen has convinced me of this. But bear with me and just assume I know what I'm talking about in that respect for a minute (it'll all become evident in the next couple of years anyway).
What I've been telling people for the past hour or so is that, though Obama is big on government regulation and control, he's going to be the instrument that brings about the true change for freedom. You see, we've tried to run the country by flat out neoconservative values and its failed. Now the country voted for a change (while the best change was hidden from their view: Dr. Paul) and I predict that you're going to see some major changes...but they're going to be bigger government and less freedom. Most people who voted for Obama will become outraged and rightly so because you voted with the best of intentions and pretty much got "janked". If you thought this election was important, wait for 2012. You see, by that time, most peolpe will see that there is something fatally wrong with our current way of government and they will again look for change, but this time they will be wary of the Marxists and will instead turn to people who advocate freedom. Currently, that man is Ron Paul. By 2012, it could be someone else (probably endorsed by Dr. Paul) or it could still be Ron Paul.
You see, between the constitution and the intents of the founding fathers, we're no where near where we should be right now. The president has too much power, Congress is basically a joke, the Fed continues to inflate the dollar, and the IRS continues to be the tool for redistribution. Freedom works, though in liberal universities and on the media you're told it's what caused this whole mess. But we don't really have freedom (SEC regulations, FDA regulations, etc.) I could go on and on about this but if the concept of freedom and true constitutional government interests you, then read "The Revolution: A Manifesto" by Ron Paul. (you see that name a lot? he's one of the very few politician who sees where the problems are at the roots, not just the symptoms)
Actually, these are my recommendations to you:
Read "The Revolution: A Manifesto" by Ron Paul.
Once you do that, join the Ron Paul Revolution by joining the Campaign for Libert (www.campaignforliberty.com)
It's true, Obama's not going to move us toward freedom, but he will be the tool for freedom to finally rise back. Whether you hold Obama as the "American messiah" or curse the ground he walks on, just understand, hope is coming.
And for those of you who share my faith, don't forget: God knows what He's doing, and He's in control. No matter how bad things seem or will seem.
Categories: Campaign For Liberty, Current Events, Revolution
Tags:
Showing comments 1—2 of 2
Posted 11/04/08
JVenske
Waconia, MN | Well stated! |
Posted 11/05/08
Martinx07
Glendale, CA | One of the best posts ever!! |
You must be logged in to post comments. [Become a member]
|
After watching CNN on and off at work today, it became evident just how incredibly corrupt and dominated the mainstream media truely is. I watched as huge headline after huge headline crossed the screen declaring Joe Biden's scoff at the mere suggestion that Barack Obama is a Marxist. I watched as the headline told of John McCain's latest attack on Obama. I also watched as the headline told about Obama giving some kind of "heroic" last minute effort to swing the votes in his favor.
It's funny how much you can learn by looking at the news with the sound off.
Now, to understand where I coming from, you have to understand the basic nature of the two politicians up for election in 2008:
John McCain is going to be more of the same we've had with Bush. He's a neoconservative and has placed extreme confidence in the current direction of the government.
Barack Obama is going to be worse, much worse. The man is a blatant Marxist and globalist. His history shows it, his voting record shows it, and interviews he's done in the past show it. The degeneration of the American government will be accelerated ten-fold.
So of the two candidates, Barack is the one that the American people have to fear and also the candidate that the Elitists in charge of the government, the UN, and the economy want in office. In my opinion, he's dangerous.
So the media wants this guy in office, but they want to try to look like they're being as balanced as possible. They do this in three ways:
Number one, they try to keep as much attention on Obama as possible. If that man coughs, he appears on the news.
Number two, they do report on McCain and Sarah Palin. But aside from the character attacks on the two, they also do one other thing that's slightly more subtle. When they don't want to directly report on a negative aspect of the pseudo-conservative candidate, they just show his latest attack on Obama, not necessarily reporting it in a negative light, just showing that McCain is attacking. You'll notice that the media very rarely reports Obama as attacking McCain. Usually he's "responding", or "bringing to light", or "correcting." Obama always seems to be doing something positive.
Number three, they report on, and attempt to show the foolishness of, all the facts that people have a problem with when speaking of Obama. The latest one was the attempt to show that it is foolish to call Obama a marxist. It doesn't matter if people believe the news story, anytime from that point on. if someone who opposes Obama brings up any of those particular facts, they will be told that those facts are either not true or foolish. Here's some of those facts I've heard dismissed as foolish or not true which I have later personally confirmed as true or valid:
1. The fact that the man has been a Marxist for most of his life
2. The fact that he very much holds to and believes the ideals of his extremely radical and racists minister.
3. His connections with terrorists and terrorist groups
4. His desire to socialize America and warp our constitution to fit a globalist agenda
These accusations are all thought of as rediculous, but don't they seem pretty serious to you?
I understand the importance of starting a third party and I will be voting third party. However, you have to understand that the media DOES NOT want grass roots movements to gain power. If they are attacking neoconservatives, they will attack true conservatives and constitutionalists all the more.
What am I trying to say in this scatterbrained group of thoughts? Don't believe everything that pops up on your tv screen. But you already knew that. Or did you?
Categories: Media, Presidential Race
Tags:
Showing comments 1—1 of 1
Posted 10/28/08
Rick Vandeven
Chaffee, MO | When Obama takes office, and he will be elected, most if not all of his decisions will be center left. There are a lot of libertarians out there who are actually voting for Obama.
With a Democrat majority in the Executive and Legislative Branches, and the dire economic situation which is not going away anytime soon, the restless voters will elect a Republcan majority in two years and we will once again have the "best case scenerio": a Democrat President and a Republican House and Senate.
I think it is just an means to an end though and I will be voting for either Barr or Baldwin! |
You must be logged in to post comments. [Become a member]
|
Here's a list of Congressmen that represent Indiana that need to get out of there. These people all either voted for the bailout both times or (in the case of Andre Carson) switched and voted for it the second time. Vote against these people.
House of Representatives
Joe Donelly (district 2)
Mark Souder (district 3)
Andre Carson (district 7)
Brad Ellsworth (district 8)
Senate
Evan Bayh
Richard G. Lugar
These people all seem to support the Fiat money system and socialization of our economy. They all need to be fired.
Categories: Voting
Tags:
No comments yet.
You must be logged in to post comments. [Become a member]
|
I wonder if anyone has noticed the similarity between Obama's tax policy and the initial forming of the IRS. I was reminded, after reading Dr. Paul's book, of how the income tax started. It was proposed as a tax only on the very rich and that the vast majority of the population would never see that tax. We all know how that ended up.
Now look at Obama. He has expressed that he wants to raise taxes on those making more than $250,000 a year. He keeps telling us that 95% of the population would not see that tax increase. He's making the exact same type of promise that was made when the Income tax was first instituted. If history teaches us anything, this makes him economically dangerous to you and me. It slightly disturbs me that of the two bad main candidates we have for president, this man is the more popular of the two. He's touted as the champion of the people! With all his economic policies that he's supported it's painfully clear that the man is a blatent marxist.
As I said, I don't like either candidate and am personally voting for Chuck Baldwin. The fact of the matter is though that of the two major candidates up for office right now, one is mediocre and won't really make much real change; the other is dangerous and will enforce more centralized and socialized government. However this election goes, we are either going to have it bad or worse.
Let's start working on 2012 now, we have GOT to get Dr. Paul or someone very similar into office soon or the last great free country on earth will cease to be free.
Categories: 3rd Parties, Democratic Party, Economy
Tags:
No comments yet.
You must be logged in to post comments. [Become a member]
|
| |
Local Coordinator
RSS feed
