Posted by PhilRidley on 02/10/10

Reactive nitrogen threat to global wellness:

Two articles from Christian Science Monitor: [/b]

- Earth's growing nitrogen threat: It helps feed a hungry world, but it's worse than CO2.

 - The next major threat to the ozone layer: nitrous oxide Each molecule remains in the atmosphere for about 100 years, meaning the gas can deplete the ozone layer as much others covered by the 1987 Montreal Protocol:

 - Nitrogen in Europe

 ----------------------

This is my response:

This is a load of nonsense, now that climategate has collapsed the UN's attempt at a global carbon tax to fund world government. They tried this one back in the 1970's, claiming that n02 gas emissions (laughing gas) and dust from industry would block out the sun and reduce humanity to a few breeding pairs at the equator.

Back then, again, a global tax and regulation on industry and humanity was the "solution". You think the UN may have a self interest in a global tax on production?

“The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

Kenneth Watt, Ecologist, quote from first UN Earth Day 1970.

-----------------

For true environmentalism, from a fresh Libertarian perspective, from one of Ron Paul's hero's, listen "Conservation, Ecology, and Growth": http://mises.org/media/1804

From the free audio version Murray N Rothbard's "For a New Liberty: http://mises.org/media.aspx?action=category&ID=87

-----------------

But the reason for the new bogey man, which was the old bogey man in the bogus 1970's scare of global cooling, read this excerpt from the UN's key think tank, the Club of Rome's book "The first global revolution". It outlined how they would use bogeymen to unite people under them. Al Gore is a member.

p75 "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself." Here is the full text of the book:

file:///2/items/TheFirstGlobalRevolution/TheFirstGlobalRevolution.pdf 

Posted by PhilRidley on 01/26/10
Last updated 01/26/10

"China to lead world research by 2020" is the real title in the UK Telegraph article.

Communist Scientists lead the world in Junk Science and comedy for elitists.

The whole article is junk save for the comedy at the end. Check it out:

"Thomas Reuters called China's Growth (In peer reviewed journal articles) "awe inspiring" although he acknowledged that the value of the findings by its scientists was "rather mixed".

When he says rather mixed, he really means fraudulent, but what the heck, this is journalism after all!

Its like sure, China is producing more widgets, and its government are paying more men to shovel dirt, but are the widgets any good, and are their government projects producing any value? To date, much of this "production" has been funded by the US Government's borrowing, which has let the Yuan remain artificially low, which is the only way that rubbish Chinese imports have been able to displace quality US and European production. It is similar to the days when the USA propped up Uncle Joe's USSR with subsidized wheat exports.

So, expect Chinese scientists to come up with a new replacement for global warming now that it has been discredited, and expect idiots like the one who wrote this article to report those lies, I mean findings, as fact, simply because they were peer reviewed, in secret, in a Communist country!! Like, do you think a Chinese Scientist can say ANYTHING it government disagrees with and avoid compulsory organ donation? Give me a break!

Posted by PhilRidley on 01/18/10
Last updated 01/20/10

Before you jump to conclusions, I am against trans-fats! I picked up The UK Guardian today and read an apparently nice article about how doctors want transfats banned, and how the all loving UN is against them also, who wouldn't? They cause almost all types of degenerative disease! But no word yet from our national government because big food monopolies need transfats to extend shelf lives in their war against local farmers and local food production.

So why is this proposed ban a bad thing? The truth is, that transfats are only lawful because the Food Standards Agency approves them, thus making food manufacturers immune from prosecution in Common Law Courts after a Grand Jury ruled to have the case heard, because these government agencies are used to ration justice. A jury would no doubt find them guilty of causing premeditated harm to the citizenry, because as the article states, we all know they are killing people. If we accept the Government's power to ban things, we accept their power to allow them, all of this destroys our personal liberties and our common law right to justice. So, in partnership with government, they are carrying out genocide. A couple of class actions would destroy their fraudulent business model, in the free market.

And what is the Food Standards Agency focused on right now? A battle against saturated fats. This ludicrous campaign by government has been used to justify Shyan Kolvekar who is actively promote the banning of butter, which the Guardian's article admits does not include any dangerous trans-fats. What we need is government out of the way of justice and food safety. And everybody knows the French consume ludicrous quantities of butter, cream and cheese and have the lowest heart disease rate in the world after Japan. The government suggest this is because they drink wine, but, have you seen how much wine the British consume?! So of course, its total nonsense.

That is why I carried out a Butter is Better protest in London, check this blog for the lowdown.

And the truth is, evidence shows that saturated fats don't cause heart disease, on the contrary, we need them, and most excess fat in the blood is created by the consumption of refined sugar and white flour. But lets not have science get in the way of a fraudulent buck!

Click here if you want to really know your fats, understand that government is spending your hard earned money to propagandize against the truth to profit corporations who haven't earned the right to earn money, and become a Libertarian. I hope people call Shyan and let his secretary know how they feel.

Check out the: Butter is Better Protest

Posted by PhilRidley on 01/18/10
Last updated 01/18/10

]

Wandering through the streets of Hampstead, London, this Sunday, we came across The Button Lady in the antiques emporium. Now, for me I have a bitter sweet experience when I look at old things. I like old streets and antiques and am a trained historic conservation professional. But for me, its more than things, these things were products of liberty, products of interaction with gold and silver coins because people will do more things for others if they get precious metals in return instead of paper money. Socialism can't produce them because it destroys the incentive to do things for other people, and we can't produce nice things if much of our money is consumed with tax. People also won't keep nice things on their person if they lack a right to bear arms and protect themselves. So, when I walk down a windy street or see an antique, I see, not only the work of human ingenuity, but also the products of liberty. I am sad that it is not produced anymore and I get focussed about what we could have, with modern technology if we had Liberty.

Anyhow, I saw enamel buttons, mini mosaic buttons, buttons with micro sized portraits. I also went to a stall selling dolls house things from Victorian and Edwardian times. I asked the elderly pensioner selling things there and asked whether they had shops selling this stuff when she was a child. She laughed and said that these were in Junk shops back then, in the 1930's. Its like George Orwell's 1984, where the only nice things are in 2nd hand stores, and I'm sick of it. Unfortunately, the husband of the button lady announced that he is a socialist. I exclaimed shock that business owners are often the most viciously socialist, always apologetic about trading, even tho I explained that he can only make money by satisfying other people in voluntary interactions. I asked him whether he'd like government to provide buttons!

We haven't had enough liberty to produce decent buttons and beautiful things for children for OVER 100YRS. So its a bellweather. Once we get beautiful buttons, you know you have Liberty, and once you get liberty, you have to protect it with all you have. Do you capture the amount of Liberty we must regain to build beautiful cities again, make beautiful buttons and delightful things for children? We can do it, but, without gold and silver as a motivation, and with socialism destroying our motivation, we absolutely must use antiques and old places to fill our motivation. The ridiculous thing is that those elitists controlling the world suffer as much as us from living in a squalid environment.

Posted 01/18/10 celticreeler Rolla, MO

This is such a great piece! Thank you so much! I boycott Communist China--so there isn't too much to buy--and I also visit secondhand stores to find really quality treasures. Another route is going to rural festivals here in the American Midwest, where there are often craftspeople making useful things, like soap, "treenware" (wooden kitchen utensils), hand-spun woolen goods, etc. Hang in there!

Posted by PhilRidley on 01/17/10
Last updated 01/17/10

UK politicians, after decades of being bastards, I mean, bastions of the family, have decided to spend your hard earned money producing "Bounty Packs" for new parents that will be "Instruction Manuals" for your new child. Yes, they actually call them bounty packs. You will get an information pack on all the wisdom of combined lobbyists and psychopathic politicians about how to bring up your children.

Fathers used to have some say at home, but now, not only does government provide all we need in an "instruction manual", but the "bounty pack" includes a section telling the Father how important the Mother is in raising a child. This will be particularly useful for those Men who've lost their job to pay for big government, big banking and the genocide of brown people overseas.

Its easy to chuckle, but later in the paper we have a story explaining that the government is refusing to bring child cruelty cases to court, leaving children at real risk without judicial care. But, that is the purpose of the government's involvement in courts. Their only role can be to ration justice. And we discover that the UK's Children's Minister was previously head of Camden Council and covered up two of the UK's worst recorded pedophile rings. And Blairs Government was littered with pedophile connections. Government have used this crisis to subject anybody working with children to criminal checks. Even registering parents to play with children in playgrounds. But organizations are only obliged to do the the test, once that is done, the organization has absolved its 'legal responsibilities' and can keep any criminal working with children without letting parents know, so, the new system is a charter for hiding rings, whilst normal parents are suffering tyranny.

You think she'll have control over the "Bounty Packs"? You betcha. With this in mind, do you think that government will eventually make parents sign contracts that they will raise children in accordance with what lobbyists and psychopath politicians choose to put into the "instruction manual"? I think this is the plan. Those parents who break the contract can experience the wrath of child 'protection' services. And you bet that requirements will become increasingly ridiculous, contradictory and changeable if this is the plan.

Watch Brian Gerrish talking about the State kidnapping children via CPS if you don't believe that this happens. Click here for the rest of the talk. 

I advise all parents to return the "manual" to sender, stating "No Contract" on the envelope, and, do not register your child, this, like registering your car, is a transfer of ownership that makes you "registered keeper" thus giving corporate juryless courts power to take your children.

Any parent must read this article about the power they give the state when they register their child.

Posted 01/26/10 Elysiumboy Billericay, United Kingdom

I couldn't watch the clip as I'm catching the football, but the TPUC article is startling and I've already heard plenty about the banning of parents from parks unless they register. It sounds like a game of poker; they are using anything they can grasp to prop up their ante. I love the bit about we are out of recession again because growth was registered and people started borrowing again. How the f**k do we keep on making the same mistake, it's ludicrous.