Campaign For Liberty: ssshock

Scott Shock
ssshock
County Coordinator
Location: Seattle, WA
Last login: 11/20/09
RSS feed





ssshock's weblog


Bookmark and Share
Posted by ssshock on 11/13/09
Last updated 11/13/09


We could potentially use this information against any Senator or Representative that refuses to help bring the FULL AND ORIGINAL Audit the Fed bill to the floor for an independent up or down vote on its merits.  "You mean you don't want a full audit of the Fed in spite of the prospect that they may have swapped the nation's gold for TUNGSTEN?"

Here are the details as reported at this point.  Story needs more investigation.  SEE MY NOTE IN BOLD AT THE END.  --Scott


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------

http://harveyorgan.blogspot.com/2009/11/nov-1209-commentaryextremely.html

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2009

Nov 12.09 commentary..extremely important...more information on the tungsten "gold bars"

 Good evening to you all: First of all before going into todays gold and silver trading, Rob Kirby has sent to us more findings on the tungsten "gold" barcaper.   

Kirby's newest commentary is simply earth-shattering. 

Here is a summary of his findings.  The complete article follows my comments. 

1. As I reported to you a few weeks ago, there were reports of 400 0z bars of gold found in the Bank of England filled with tungsten.  It was reported to you that tungsten has the same specific gravity of gold, so it is easy to manufacture a fake brick.  Only an electrical test could determine which bar is real. 

2.  Kirby also identified that the GLD list in London had the bar list go from 1381 pages to under 200 and then back to 800 pages, even though the gold inventory of GLD  was increasing from 1080 tonnes to gold to its present value of 1118 tonnes. 

3.  During the week of Oct 1.09, there were irregular physical gold settlements and the Bank of England had to intervene on behalf of JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank  as these two banks did not have the physical gold backing its delivery. 

4.  China is known as the knock off capital of the world.  Everyone thought that they were the manufacturers of these tungsten bricks. The Chinese were the ultimate buyers of these tungsten bricks and they decided that they needed to get to the bottom of this fiasco.  In their interrogation process they found the perpetrators and put them behind bars and in the process discovered that it was the usa who orchestrated the manufacture of these fake bars  

5.   The usa manufactured anywhere btw. 1.3 to 1.5 million bars of  400 0z weight or roughly 16,000 metric tonnes.  The usa holds 8,000 meteric tonnes of gold and the world roughly 30,000 metric tonnes. 

6.    Approximately  640,000 of these tungsten bricks of 400 oz weight were shipped to Fort Knox.  The weight in oz is 256 million oz which is roughly the 8,000 tonnes of gold that Fort Knox supposedly holds. 

7.    The remaining 8,000 metric tonnes were shipped to international centres and sold on the international market.  Many of thse bars ended up at the GLD. 

8.    Kirby has documents which show that his folks have copies of original shipping documents with dates and EXACT WEIGHTS OF THE TUNGSTEN BARS SHIPPED TO FORT KNOX. 

9.     This may help explain why Rothschild's left in 2004 as they probably knew that many of the bricks at the B of E were fake. 

10.   It may help explain why no news came out on the raid at the Nymex in Feb 2004 where the District Attorney was investigating Stuart Smith, VP of operations at the Nymex. We has issued a search warrant and he abruptly left and to this day has not been heard from. 

The above will help explain why I cannot balance supply and demand of gold.  We know that demand is somewhere around 4500 tonnes of gold and supply around 2400 tonnes and thus the deficit was funded with supplies from central banks.  The above ground gold supplied by the central banks came through the leasing process.

The leasing of gold started in 1988 and with a deficit of 2000 tonnes per annum, the world should have run out of gold a few years ago.  It did not.

Now we know why!!!!!!

Everything now makes sense and the balance of "gold" supplied into the market was in reality tungsten bricks.

<<<http://harveyorgan.blogspot.com/2009/11/nov-1209-commentaryextremely
.html
>>>>

Here are a few key excerpts:

"The amount of "salted tungsten" gold bars in question was allegedly between 5,600 and 5,700 - 400 oz - good delivery bars [roughly 60 metric tonnes]."

"Roughly 15 years ago - during the Clinton Administration [think Robert Rubin, Sir Alan Greenspan and Lawrence Summers] - between 1.3 and 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten blanks were allegedly manufactured by a very high-end, sophisticated refiner in the USA [more than 16 Thousand metric tonnes]. Subsequently, 640,000 of these tungsten blanks received their gold plating and WERE shipped to Ft. Knox and remain there to this day."

Is this story for real?  Hard to say, but given the history of manipulation of gold by the Federal Reserve (e.g., see http://www.zerohedge.com/article/smoking-gun-fed-controlling-gold, and www.gata.org), how will we know unless we carry out a full audit of the Federal Reserve?

More Federal Reserve Gold Manipulation Links:


http://www.zerohedge.com/article/declassified-state-dept-data-highlights-global-
high-level-arrangement-remain-masters-gold

http://news.goldseek.com/GATA/1257721500.php


http://www.commodityonline.com/futures-trading/technical/Gold-price-suppression-
is-public-policy-in-America-12672.html


http://www.canadianbusiness.com/markets/market_news/article.jsp?content=b2917722
19&utm_source=markets


http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/duh-barrick-is-bullish-on-gold.html

http://www.coinresource.com/news/gold_market_manipulation.htm

http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/10/gold-market-reaching-breaking-point.html

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/11/whats-fed-hiding.html

Chinese website about tungsten substitution for gold:

http://www.tungsten-alloy.com/en/alloy11.htm 

For those worried about their gold coins, check out this device, and note the comment that no tungsten coin fakes have been identified:

http://www.fisch.co.za/principle.htm  (technically, a tungsten fake COULD get by this device)

More info on resistance and other testing methods:


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1CHMI_enUS343US343&q=resistance
+tester+for+gold+coins&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
 





Categories: Finance, Commodities, Ethics, Current Events, Economy, Monetary Policy
Tags:

Showing comments 1—7 of 7

Posted 11/13/09

fadestyle
Walnut Bottom, PA
This is awesome, may I repost?
Posted 11/13/09

LogisticEarth
Conshohocken, PA
It's interesting but extremely fishy, I'm still skeptical and would need something more beyond ambigous blog posts.

Isn't there a chain-of-custody for the bars, it should be easy to trace them back to whereever they came from.
Posted 11/13/09

fadestyle
Walnut Bottom, PA
Logisticearth...

The undeniable proof would come out in hr1207

but then again our government lies so much even if we did an audit the would just deny it. our government is a pathological liar.

when the government says one thing... i do the exact opposite. I has worked well for a while now and i will continue on that path until its fixed and even then i will be very vigilant.

I also found a main stream news story a while back and cant find it right htis second but it stated that there is a huge problem with gold bar loading and the USA blamed china... heh, conveniently.
Posted 11/13/09

gwydion75
Sunland, CA
This is the sort of thing that makes the rest of the country think we're retarded. Get some sources man. Do some proper investigating and reporting. Don't put this line by line editorial and say "LOOK AT THIS DAMNING EVIDENCE!" There's no evidence here.

You're making us all look like retards.
Posted 11/13/09

BillNM
Carlsbad, NM
Just fire the thing up to 2000 deg F. If it doesn't melt, then it could be tungsten. Sounds like a fairy tale.
Posted 11/13/09

fadestyle
Walnut Bottom, PA
This blog is in no way a representation of C4L

dont you understand this is his personal blog. if you dont like it then click away.

i hate collective mind denial. do your own research buddy. If you would have been paying attention this person is asking a question and saying it needs more investigation. read and investigate before you "kill" the messenger.
Posted 11/13/09

fadestyle
Walnut Bottom, PA
gwydion75 i read the entire blog and could not find where he said "LOOK AT THIS DAMNING EVIDENCE"

I think he asked a question at the top first "part".

check this out people and see if you can dig up some research and facts please.

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=28529


You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by ssshock on 10/30/09


Here's some info on flu and cold prevention and treatment that I put together about a month ago:

Stay healthy!

--Scott


From: Tom Ballard, RN, ND [mailto:tom@tomballardnd.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:10 PM
To: Scott S. Shock
Subject: Swine Flu and You

Hello Scott,

I'm not anti-vaccine, but I do resist anything that has been rushed to the market without years of unbiased testing. Swine flu vaccine scares me because it falls into this category. There are reports of deaths and severe neurological disease as a result of the vaccine. One report stated there have been more deaths in France from the vaccine than there have been from the flu.

What can you do instead of vaccination?

  • Frequent hand washing.
  • Plenty of rest.
  • Vitamins C and D, and zinc.
  • Nasal rinsing with saline or an herbal product such as Nasal Mist.
  • As soon as you feel a sore throat coming on, gargle with warm salt and lemon tea.
  • Keep warm. It's better to encourage the fever that your immune system uses to kill germs. Avoid chilling.
  • Acidophilus and other probiotics.
  • Immune enhancing herbs: Garlic, echinacea, oregon grape, elderberry, quercetin, golden seal, olive leaf, Reishi and shiitake mushrooms, etc (Total Well Being from Pure Wellness Labs contains all of these)
  • Non-sweet liquids such as water, vegetable juices, Greens First, Red Alert, and soups.
  • Avoid sweet foods. They suppress white blood cells. (Orange juice doesn't have enough vitamin C to overcome the immune suppression of its sugar content).
  • AlliUltra Liquid, a liquid concentrate of allicin (the active ingredient in garlic) can be gargled, sniffed, dropped into ears, or nubulized into the lungs.

 Vaccinate yourself with a healthy lifestyle rather than with experimental therapies

All the Best,
Tom

P.S. - To set up an appointment with me, just click here (this link will take you to my Website).





Categories: Health Freedom
Tags: flu, swine flu, cold, Prevention, Treatment, vaccine, reactions, alternatives, naturopath

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by ssshock on 10/29/09
Last updated 11/06/09


Before you subject yourself or your little ones to a flu shot, you may want to read these interesting articles:

"Does the Vaccine Matter?"  (Lengthy, detailed, outstanding Nov 2009 article in The Atlantic magazine, including reference to groundbreaking research from a Group Health researcher in Seattle):  http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200911/brownlee-h1n1

The following is an informative bulleted summary of the Atlantic article with comments and additional interpretation:  http://www.naturalnews.com/z027239_vaccines_flu_vaccine_.html  (If you don't have time for both, I recommend you read this one)

Articles discussing potential harmful effects from the vaccines and more:  
http://www.naturalnews.com/swine_flu_vaccine.html  (article archive)
http://swineflu.mercola.com/sites/swineflu/home.aspx  (article archive)
http://www.generationrescue.org/binstock/090928-aluminum-als-alzheimer-a
utism.htm
  (listing of new eye-opening research on the effects of aluminum in vaccines)
http://www.nvic.org/  (National Vaccine Information Center - watchdog organization, very informative site)
http://www.without-consent.com/  (award-winning investigative journalist Gary Matsuyama discusses adjuvants, see intro at NVIC:
http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/September-2009-(1)/New-WITHOUT-CONSENT-Vac
cine-Adjuvant-Website.aspx

Why has an "emergency" been declared?  Don't miss this article discussing that question, and referencing a CBS News Investigative Report exposing serious problems with the government statistics!  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/27/Obama-Declar
es-Swine-Flu-Emergency.aspx
  Original CBS report here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/21/cbsnews_investigates/main5404829.shtml
?tag=cbsnewsLeadStoriesArea
 

This also sheds a little different perspective on the situation: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3763  (For more point by point details, read the text of the petition letter here: 
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=
1610
, and consider sending off a copy of the petition.)

Even Dr. Weil has been targeted as a result of the new government powers from the "emergency" declaration:  http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_19464.cfm

Meanwhile, despite all the hype, the swine flu is not any more dangerous than the normal flu (see point #1):  http://www.naturalnews.com/027222_swine_flu_flu_vaccine_swine_flu_vaccine.
html

And, it appears that the swine flu has peaked out already (despite the mass media hype and the declaration of emergency):

http://www.naturalnews.com/027347_vaccines_swine_flu_H1N1.html

Detailed analysis by Dr. Russell Blaylock: 
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/Wha
t-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx
 
(see also Blaylock's website - click swine flu link at top: http://www.russellblaylockmd.com/)

I hope you'll carefully consider the lack of benefit of the vaccine as discussed in The Atlantic article, versus the potential risks discussed in many other articles.  And I wish you and your family a happy, healthy holiday season, free from unwarranted hype and hysteria!

Yours in pursuit of health and truth,

Scott

 

 





Categories: Education, Media, Civil Liberties, Domestic Policy, Health Freedom, Ethics, Executive Power, Current Events, Social Issues
Tags: swine flu, vaccine, Fraud, emergency, hype, vaccine effects

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by ssshock on 10/22/09
Last updated 10/23/09


Fellow Liberty Activists,

Here's a quick update for you on some local and national events, resources, and priorities:

1. Local Voters Guide - Check out the endorsements page at Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights - http://www.capr.us/capr_endorsements.php

2. Local Events, Action Items, and Outreach Opportunities:

3. IMPORTANT: Strategic Plan to Stop Global Government Formation via Climate Treaty in Copenhagen in December 2009 - please give me your comments to improve this plan! - http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=26752

 

For Liberty,

Scott Shock

King County Coordinator

www.campaignforliberty.com

206-650-3421

P.S., Congratulations to Washington State C4L members for all of the hard work on Audit the Fed petition gathering.  We won the nationwide petition competition in September, with over 7,000 petitions!  We'll get $1500 from C4L national to help build our state organization!  BUT, let's not let our efforts go to waste.  Please take action now on the URGENT item above!  Details here:  http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=26751.

P.P.S., I look forward to seeing you at our next monthly meeting to discuss health care policy with Dr. Roger Stark from Washington Policy Center!  Details here:  http://www.meetup.com/SeattleC4L/calendar/11488836/.

 

 





Categories: Campaign For Liberty, Globalism, Law, Health Freedom, Grassroots News, Action Item, Federal Legislation, Current Events, Voting, Monetary Policy
Tags: health care, 604, Eyman, 1033, voters guide, King County

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]

Bookmark and Share
Posted by ssshock on 10/22/09
Last updated 11/02/09


Fellow American Patriots,

We must put together a plan to stop this move to global government ASAP!  I've outlined a strategic plan below, and look forward to your input.  --Scott

WATCH THE VIDEO of Lord Monckton warning what the climate treaty will establish:  1) World Government, 2) Repayment of 'Climate Debt' (transfer of wealth from western nations to third world nations), and 3) Enforcement. 

Video of Monckton's October 14th speech:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40 

Information from the YouTube page:

A draft of the treaty can be read here:  http
://www.globalclimatescam.com/documents/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf
 &nbs
p;Here are some observations on the draft document as accessed on 10/22/09:
Page 18: Section 38 of "A shared vision for long-term cooperative action" contains the text for forming the new government.
Page 43: Section 41 discusses possible taxation methods
Page 45: Section 46 Subsection (c) contains discussion of land use planning
Page 45: Section 46 Subsection (h) of the "Objectives, scope, and guiding principles" contains the text for enforcement and establishment of the rule of law.

"There has been considerable debate raised about Monckton's conclusion that the Copenhagen Treaty would cede US sovereignty. His comments appear to be based upon his interpretation of the The Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 2). This clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. TREATIES as the supreme law of the land. Concerns have been raised in the past that a particularly ambitious treaty may supersede the US Constitution. In the 1950s, a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, was proposed in response to such fears, but it failed to pass. You can read more about the Bricker Amendment in a 1953 Time Magazine article: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,806676-1,00.html"

Copy of the PowerPoint presentation by Lord Monckton:  http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/monckton_2009.pdf

Notes about the whole speech and the speaker here:  http://www.globalclimatescam.com/

We've got to take action to head this thing off now.  Perhaps the best opportunity to stop this will be in pushing the Senate to reject the treaty.  Read the following to get some ideas as to possible opportunities and issues in trying to block the treaty in the Senate:

The Essentials in Copenhagen

http://en.cop15.dk/news/view+news?newsid=876

EXCERPT:  "The Kyoto Protocol which sets binding targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions has been signed and ratified by 184 parties of the UN Climate Convention. One notable exception is the United States, and Yvo de Boer is "really happy" to see the US back in the international climate change process and that the US is also engaging domestically in the process.

"My big lesson from the Kyoto era is that it's really important that the government delegation that represents the United States is in close touch with the Senate, with the elected officials on what's acceptable and what's not," says de Boer, and he adds:

"I think that a major shortcoming of Kyoto was that the official delegation came back with a treaty they knew was never going to make it through the Senate. And this time I have the feeling that the communication is much stronger, that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, through John Kerry, is really expressing strongly what they feel needs to be done in Copenhagen."

Yvo de Boer thinks the Kyoto Protocol was rejected by the US for mainly two reasons. Firstly, because it did not involve action on the part of major developing countries. Secondly, because it was felt by the Bush administration that Kyoto would be harmful to the US economy."

 

This article is further food for thought on strategy development:

Restore the Senate's Treaty Power

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/opinion/05bolton.html

EXCERPTS:  "Like past presidents, Mr. Obama will likely be tempted to avoid the requirement that treaties must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate. The usual methods around this constitutional constraint are executive agreements or a majority vote in the House and Senate to pass a treaty as a simple law (known as a Congressional-executive agreement).

Executive agreements have an acknowledged but limited place in our foreign affairs. Congressional-executive agreements are far more troubling. They have evoked scathing attacks by constitutional experts and have been strongly resisted in the Senate, at least so far."

"America needs to maintain its sovereignty and autonomy, not to subordinate its policies, foreign or domestic, to international control. On a broad variety of issues - many of which sound more like domestic rather than foreign policy - the re-emergence of the benignly labeled "global governance" movement is well under way in the Obama transition.

Candidate Obama promised to "re-engage" and "work constructively within" the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Will the new president pass a new Kyoto climate accord through Congress by sidestepping the constitutional requirement to persuade two-thirds of the Senate?"

"President Bill Clinton signed Kyoto, but the Senate in effect rejected it. He also signed the Rome Treaty of 1998 that established an International Criminal Court, which would subject American soldiers and officials to unaccountable international prosecutors and judges for alleged war crimes (including, potentially, the undefined crime of "aggression"). Mr. Clinton did not even send this agreement to the Senate. Mr. Bush "unsigned" it. Mr. Obama might re-sign it and seek approval by only a majority of both houses of Congress."

"It is true that some multinational economic agreements, like Bretton Woods, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and the North American Free Trade Agreement, went into effect after approval by majorities of Congress rather than two-thirds of the Senate. But international agreements that go beyond the rules of international trade and finance - that involve significant national-security commitments, or that purport to delegate lawmaking and enforcement functions to international organizations, or that could fundamentally alter the American constitutional system of individual rights - should receive the intense scrutiny of the treaty process, regardless of their policy merits."

 

STRATEGIC PLAN TO STOP THE CLIMATE TREATY - Considering all of the above, some elements of a strategy begin to come into focus:

1.       Immediate development of a petition campaign and a media campaign to ramp up to the Copenhagen conference.  Campaign for Liberty should lead the effort and build a large coalition of many organizations.

2.       Mass deliveries of petitions, phone calls, faxes to the Senate, to Obama, and to national and local media.

3.       Regular screenings of the movie "Not Evil, Just Wrong" nationwide between now and the December conference.  (C4L should encourage every member to do a showing in their neighborhood!)

4.       Mass distribution of DVD copies of "Not Evil, Just Wrong", including to the national and local media.  (C4L should make a mass distribution arrangement with the filmmakers to get them more inexpensively.)

5.       Parents demand schools show "Not Evil, Just Wrong" if they've shown Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth"  (lesson plans available with DVDs
http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/shop?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypa
ge.tpl&product_id=13&category_id=2
)

6.       Other reputable movies, YouTube clips, etc can be assembled for use in the campaign as an alternate to, or in support of "Not Evil, Just Wrong".  Possible options include:

7.       Introduce bills to "repeal" the un-ratified 17th Amendment in State Legislatures, restoring Constitutionally required appointment of Senators, as discussed in the following two articles.  This effort would introduce widespread discussion of the risk of Senate approval of the Climate Treaty and other usurpations of U.S. Sovereignty and states' rights.

8.       Maintain a clear and strong focus on achieving passage of H.R. 1207 and S. 604 to Audit the Fed (since the U.S. funds a large portion of the United Nations programs, including these climate change treaty actions).

9.       Campaign for Liberty recruitment should be a key part of all events and efforts so that we can build our strength for the coming Senate battle (and for other efforts).

 

Please send me your thoughts on this strategy ASAP, and I'll recompile a revised strategic plan.

 

King County Coordinator

www.campaignforliberty.com

ssshock@comcast.net

206-650-3421

 

 





Categories: Campaign For Liberty, Globalism, Action Item, US Constitution, Executive Power, State Legislation, World Affairs, Congress
Tags: IPCC, united nations, sovereignty, Copenhagen, climate change, Climate Treaty, global government, Strategic Plan

No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post comments.  [Become a member]


Recent Entries

Has the Federal Reserve swapped our gold for TUNGSTEN???
Flu prevention & treatment
Swine Flu "Emergency" & Flu Shots - A Reality Check
***IMPORTANT C4L King County Update***
Strategic Plan to Stop Global Government Formation via Climate Treaty
***Action Needed: Stop Senators from Selling Out Audit the Fed!!!***
The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare
The Myth of the "Consumer Spending Problem"
Give the FED some competition! WSJ Op Ed
Bailout Nation
Nickels Hides While Gun Owners Oppose Seattle Gun Ban Scheme
Stop the Government Insanity!

ssshock's contacts

Showing contacts 1—10 of 151

View all of ssshock's contacts


jamiek83


bouleuterion


dwrogers


rokeefe


Katherine


dthompson


Morgan Catha


Blackie Chan


Kryzulae


Loganspawn





Locations of visitors to this page






"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson





Campaign for Liberty is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization which neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office and claims no
responsibility for the actions of individuals or groups of individuals who use the Campaign for Liberty logo or name or who may claim to act as
representatives of the Campaign for Liberty without prior written consent of the Campaign for Liberty. [?]