Ron Paul on the Fair Sentencing Act

Posted by Anthony Gregory on 07/28/10 3:47 PM
Last updated 07/28/10 3:47 PM
 
[Newer: Left and Right Against the Drug War] [Older: Alan Grayson on Antiwar Radio ]

Here Dr. Paul talks on the House floor about the horribly unjust and inequitable drug war, and an effort to stem some of the greatest sentencing abuses. It's a good start, but does not go far enough, Paul concludes.

Here's some more info on the bill.

 







Categories: Ron Paul, Civil Liberties, US Constitution, Federal Legislation, Social Issues
Tags:

Showing comments 1—7 of 7

Posted 07/28/10 5:37 PM

Willij4lib
Everett, WA
“Government management doesn’t make sense”

Very well said Ron Paul, I am still laughing because it is so damn true.

Here we have these managers to manage and they don't have any experience managing in any other format other than Government. None of their decision making is measured by the results, so they have no basis in which to manage.

The statistics of Government in states and on the federal level is very poor at best because they have not realized how to sustain themselves with out steeling from the work force. This only builds resentments and does nothing to bring about prosperity.

The drug war you speak of is one of the many examples of failure on a large scale and this is not put into the decision process, they just keep making it bigger and the mess keeps getting bigger. When do we ask, when is a mess too big? Because they grow it bigger doesn’t fix it, it complicates it and with these results alone we could start a course on how to salvage stupid because we are going to need it. Stupid is by far our biggest growing asset in this country, at this rate we are going to be overrun by the stupid and stupid doesn't manage anything. If you cannot manage yourself you cannot possibly manage any other.

Posted 07/28/10 10:29 PM

pwrk06
anaheim, CA
Yes, government intervention creates more problems for the government to intervene in. This cycle inevitably leads to the diminishing of liberties and the growth of the nanny state. Cheers to Ron Paul. It is unfortunate that he is one of but a few of Congress who are actually qualified to represent the people rather than personal interest.

Posted 07/29/10 02:18 AM

T-Paine
Waddell, AZ
It sounds like to me that this particular bill is designed to end federal sentencing disparangancies between different groups of people.

Posted 07/29/10 02:26 AM

kpasa01
Charleston, SC
I like how Mr. Paul seemed rather pissed at the end of his statement. Check out the way he walked off. I think he is started to grow tired of the way things are going. Ron is always a calm, collective guy but, I think once the primaries roll around, he is going to start getting a little more blunt with quite a few individuals. I'm hoping he points out numerous flaws with the way that Republicans and Democrats both have been running the show.

Posted 07/30/10 07:47 AM

president
London, United Kingdom
Ron was on the Morton downey Junior show back in 1988.

Mort, said to Ron that once alcohol was legalised you had many million more Alcoholics in the country.

How would legalising the drugs end drug usage, it won't.

But aren't some drugs just so bad they need to be banned?

Posted 07/30/10 08:44 AM

BruceB
San Anselmo, CA
The drug war is too big to fail. We must bail it out!

Legalizing drugs won't stop drug abuse but it will stop government abuse and some government departments are so bad that they must be banned.

Posted 07/30/10 11:54 AM

gary ragel
Woodstown, NJ
+1 for delivering the last line in style.





You must be a member to post comments.  [Become a member]   [Login]

Locations of visitors to this page






"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson





Campaign for Liberty is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization which neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office and claims no
responsibility for the actions of individuals or groups of individuals who use the Campaign for Liberty logo or name or who may claim to act as
representatives of the Campaign for Liberty without prior written consent of the Campaign for Liberty. [?]