Posted by Matt Hawes on 10/29/08 05:32 AM Last updated 10/29/08 12:07 PM   [Newer: "Critics See Bailout Free-for-All"] [Older: "Affordable Health Care" and "Wackonomics"]

Dr. Paul will be on tonight with MSNBC's new hit host, Rachel Maddow. We still don't have an exact hit time, but the program begins at 9:00 pm ET, and we are told he should be on toward the front end of the program. Ms. Maddow is a fresh and clever voice on the National political scene and recently called Dr. Paul her favorite Republican in a New York Times interview. Should be a great interview!

UPDATE - Dr. Paul will actually be appearing in the second half of the show at 9:45 pm ET.

Posted 10/29/08 05:39 AM JohnFromChicago Columbia, TN

"Favorite Republican: I like the congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul, because I understand what he believes, and he is fearless and civic-minded in his beliefs, rather than personally zealous." There may be some kind of strange symbiotic relationship developing here. I watch Rachel's show a few times a week, and it's about the only punditry I partake in. While I really disagree with her politics, I really respect her intellect and her demeanor. I hope Ron does well on her show, and she has him back often. If we are to be the voice for change in the Republican party, we need a national media platform. Rachel's show could be a comfy place to hang out.

Posted 10/29/08 06:32 AM KMoore1223 Tampa, FL

I hope Dr. Ron avoids his signature "i told you so snickering." Why can't he just be perfect?

Posted 10/29/08 07:08 AM patriotfilms North Bergen, NJ

Once upon a time when little Rachel Maddow was just a substitute anchor I enjoyed her fresh and clever political wit, but now that she has her own cable show her socialist leaning views are really starting to shine. You know at one point I actually thought she was part of the revolution, she sure had me fooled. I guess it's a toss up between Maddow and Kieth Olbermann as to who is the better OBK (Obama butt kisser). I find it very difficult to watch either of them for more than a few minutes. Although, they both have moments of brilliant political analysis. However, it's just enough to keep you believing in the "change" mantra. I will tune in for the Ron Paul segment, for it is the only time I turn on the MSM. The Republicans have Fox with Hannity and O'Reilly, and the Democrats have MSNBC with Maddow and Olbermann, so choose your kool-aid wisely, or better yet drop the glass.

Posted 10/29/08 07:09 AM patriotfilms North Bergen, NJ

Once upon a time when little Rachel Maddow was just a substitute anchor I enjoyed her fresh and clever political wit, but now that she has her own cable show her socialist leaning views are really starting to shine. You know at one point I actually thought she was part of the revolution, she sure had me fooled. I guess it's a toss up between Maddow and Kieth Olbermann as to who is the better OBK (Obama butt kisser). I find it very difficult to watch either of them for more than a few minutes. Although, they both have moments of brilliant political analysis. However, it's just enough to keep you believing in the "change" mantra. I will tune in for the Ron Paul segment, for it is the only time I turn on the MSM. The Republicans have Fox with Hannity and O'Reilly, and the Democrats have MSNBC with Maddow and Olbermann, so choose your kool-aid wisely, or better yet drop the glass.

Posted 10/29/08 07:11 AM Andrew Sica Woodbury, CT

Yeah, I have to agree with patriotfilms. I'm glad Dr. Paul is getting some attention on her show, but I think it's just a sideshow to her. If she actually viewed him as a threat to the Obama machine, I'm not so sure he'd be on.

Posted 10/29/08 07:15 AM edmyster81 Buffalo, NY

I agree with JohnFromChicago. Ms. Maddow is one of the more intelligent interviewers out there, in my opinion. It will be interesting to see how she responds to Dr. Paul's message.

Posted 10/29/08 08:18 AM Change New Canaan, CT

I too like Rachel but agree that she has become a cheerleader for Obama. I strongly dislike Kieth Olbermann, he is a tool. I actually attended the same High school as him, and he really comes off as a better than you kind of guy. His over reliance on the dictionary clearly masks his lack of intelligence which is transparent, Who can stomach his "special comments"?. I am sure that Ron Paul will do great! However, I think the invitation is only to have Ron Paul diss McCain and the Repubicans. I bet ya, that will be her focus, all about the failures of the Repubican party. Obviously, we as Ron Paul Republicans would agree, but I assume we are not all fools to think we are not being used.

Posted 10/29/08 08:24 AM PerfektMSC Fort Monroe, VA

Mr. Hawes, Is Rachel Maddow really "fresh and clever." Let's not get carried away. Just because she's inviting Dr. Paul for an interview doesn't mean you need to blow her kisses. The woman is boring, predictable, and unoriginal--especially since she goes on the air right after Olbermann. Also, I know Dr. Paul is getting a lot of publicity now, which is great. But what kind of ratings does Maddow get? Are they as bad as her radio show? If she's a fresh and clever as you maintain, she'd be getting a better following. Respectfully yours, Michael

Posted 10/29/08 08:28 AM rdrioane Fresno, CA

I like her too. We must remember to write her an appreciative note if she treats the good doctor well. It would be awesome to have St. Paul on often.

Posted 10/29/08 08:29 AM PerfektMSC Fort Monroe, VA

Mr. Hawes, Is Rachel Maddow really "fresh and clever." Let's not get carried away. Just because she's inviting Dr. Paul for an interview doesn't mean you need to blow her kisses. The woman is boring, predictable, and unoriginal--especially since she goes on the air right after Olbermann. Also, I know Dr. Paul is getting a lot of publicity now, which is great. But what kind of ratings does Maddow get? Are they as bad as her radio show? If she's a fresh and clever as you maintain, she'd be getting a better following. Respectfully yours, Michael

Posted 10/29/08 08:53 AM smashysmashy dover, NH

I think Change is spot on about Dr. P just being used to attack McCain and the neo-republican base. This media attention is a double edged sword. It is great that he is getting all this media attention, but do you hear the comments they make before and after his interviews on CNN? They play him out to be a huge nut with an interesting but ridiculous perspective. I get so much shit from fellow graduate students (ya we are supposed to be the most open minded to new political thought my ass) for wearing his shirt and putting a sticker up. They have NO idea why they think he is crazy. They can't give me one reason. It is what the media or peers who watch the media tell them to think... Of course when I bring this to their attention, they don't take the 10 minutes to look at his platform or gather information that is not from mainstream media. Arghhh so frustrating!

Posted 10/29/08 08:55 AM AngelaTC Fenton, MI

I don't care for her. She asks questions in the same style that Jon Stewart does, with the "Don't you think....? preface. Doesn't matter. Socialism is such a flawed philosophy that it is impossible to make a strong argument for it. I have no doubt that Ron Paul will fare well as long as she is somewhat professional in her demeanor.

Posted 10/29/08 09:02 AM Andrew Sica Woodbury, CT

Rachel - you mean great for MSNBC, right?

Posted 10/29/08 09:04 AM Andrew Sica Woodbury, CT

I mean, she's not even approaching ratings in the Hannity/Oreilly stratosphere

Posted 10/29/08 09:40 AM patriotfilms North Bergen, NJ

Thanks andrewsi, I agree it's a total sideshow, that "coincidentally" came about within a week of her RP comment in the NYT. One thing is for sure about her ratings...they will spike with the RP interview. To everyone, sorry about the double post earlier.

Posted 10/29/08 12:33 PM MarilyninLakeJackson Lake Jackson, TX

I'm not familiar with Rachel Maddow, since I don't get MSNBC, but all the stations have their own agendas which have to do with ratings usually. I'm always glad to see Dr. Paul get exposure and a chance to talk. It's too little too late as far as the election, I suppose, but we have to look to the future. We've learned to take what we can get and move on. I do think we need to email these media reporters after they interview Dr. Paul and show some positive appreciation. Lots of emails help to get him back on again.

Posted 10/29/08 6:22 PM ChiefJoseph Aberdeen, WA

I'm sitting here watching the Maddow show on the Massive Socialist Network Broadcasting Channel but I missed the first seven minutes. Did I miss the interview and just subject myself to this horrible program for nothing?

Posted 10/29/08 7:00 PM ChiefJoseph Aberdeen, WA

I think I've watched nearly every MSM appearance Dr. Paul has made this election season. He always does well but this time he really hit it out of the park. People need to realize that this country's foreign policy will not change with Obama and Zbignew Brzezinski at the healm, only take on a different personality. Also, as much as Maddow gushes over Obama I was pleased to see how fairly she treated Paul, even throwing in some compliments.

Posted 10/29/08 7:08 PM ondrej West Bloomfield, MI

I watched that horrible show and I did not see Dr. Paul.

Posted 10/29/08 7:12 PM nathanjones byhalia, MS

St.Paul did well and looked more tan than usual, but what was up with his right eyebrow falling off of his face. Thats OK! we love you anyway! Its the message that counts.

Posted 10/29/08 7:21 PM BruceKoerber Cedar Rapids, IA

The remarkable and humble statesman and Congressman from Texas - Ron Paul - was given a tremendous platform on MSNBC. A few questions were asked around compliments and then Dr. Paul was allowed to speak freely. His message of true change rang out like the Liberty Bell to those listening for liberty. Although couched in the program as a statement about the future of the GOP, Ron Paul spoke about Constitutional government which is the last thing that the GOP arm of the unConstitutional coup will be discussing any time soon. The battlelines are very clear and Ron Paul is ready and able to command the forces of liberty against the weary and defeated and corrupt neo-conservatives. The unConstitutional coup knows that its GOP arm is about to be severed, and is probably scheming to cause some major disruption in an attempt to sacrifice its 'liberal' arm to try to keep its other arm from lying quivering on the ground. Political puppets still are at the mercy of their overlords but can the unConstitutional coup withstand the wrath of the people if it exposes itself as a election-fixing hierarchy?

Posted 10/29/08 10:45 PM Rusky4Liberty Buffalo Grove, IL

I agree with others that Ron Paul did very well. Sometimes he seems to stumble or state opinions not clearly but this time he sounded very polished and succinct. As for the people leaving comments about how much they hate or "tolerate" Olbermann and Maddow, I disagree with them. One of the few things that bother me about this liberty movement is the inability to discern legitimate disagreement from partisan hackery. I happen to like both Olbermann, and Maddow because they are intelligent commentators, with whom I disagree mostly on economic issues. For example, although Olbermann has that "holier than thou" demeanor, I think his criticisms of the Bush administration are so dead on and eloquent. I feel the same frustration (and hatred to be honest) that he does, but I could never voice it in such a way. I also agree with his criticisms of McCain, because let's be honest, his campaign tactics have been so dirty that they smell of naked ambition to be president and nothing more. Obama has run a much cleaner and positive campaign. I think our movement's all-too-fast dismissal of anything the mainstream media stems from the desire to be ideologically Puritan. It is too easy to not listen carefully to our opposition, and spout our libertarian viewpoints in response to legitimate concerns from people who disagree with us politically, but remember, this is exactly what our unintelligent opposition does. Just think back to the propaganda the Republicans spewed in response to Ron Paul's comments during the debates. They never addressed the issues he brought up, they just labeled him unAmerican and isolationist. I fear we tend to do the same thing, but perhaps less abrasively. One example I encountered today is that someone posted that Chuck Baldwin won the debate vs. Ralph Nader with no further comments. Although it could be a legitimate and honest opinion, I get the feeling it stemmed from the desire to maintain ideologic certitude. Did he really win the debate? Or did he just vocalize the same political opinions you already had? I'm much closer to Chuck politically, but I felt Ralph did the better job. If we want our movement to succeed, we must remember that the ultimate goal is to discover truth and to spread it, not solely to disseminate it. This is not a contest of who is more ideologically pure, who is more anti-government and for privatization. It is a quest for what is true, and what we believe is true. If we discover more truth along the way, we should include it in our platform, not dismiss it because it does not fit into our politics, even if it's lefty, socialist, mainstream, etc. This message is getting too long. There is more however, please message me if you are interested in hearing me out or share my views.

Posted 10/30/08 06:21 AM jake niehues Holton, KS

I really hope C4L is not going to be promoting a station like MSNBC! Please people, I'm very excited about C4L, don't jump in bed with the wack job station.