Government to ban meat eating to "save the planet"
Government admits, reported in the times article below, that regulations are being used to reduce meat consumption. Or is it that simple? The corporate monopolies always get exemptions.
-----------------------
The Times: Climate chief Lord Stern "give up meat to save the planet"
"People will need to turn vegetarian if the world is to conquer climate change, according to a leading authority on global warming."
Lord Stern, the author of the influential 2006 Stern Review on the cost of tackling global warming, said that a successful deal at the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December would lead to soaring costs for meat and other foods that generate large quantities of greenhouse gases. (Is this the first global genocide?)
-----------------------
This has nothing to do with saving the planet. I know that many environmentalists, attracted to this group, will balk at this post, but we must get educated or we will loose our milk, meat and farmers and have it all provided by Monsanto, et al. We must resist how the climate change agenda is being used as a tyranny over our food supply. These people will never tell us that farms only achieve optimum productivity with farmyard manure from animals!! It is asinine to suggest that banning animals will reduce farmland coverage and increase productivity. They will not tell you that cattle are one of the most efficient and effective ways of producing nutrient dense food. Any farmer, or any person with any experience of gardening will know this to be the case.
What they won't tell you, is that Britain, the third most populated country in the world is self sufficient in milk and exports heaps of the stuff, on-top of government enforcing set-aside subsidies, and milk production quota's, to ensure that corporate, mass production farmers don't flood the market and crash prices beneath the cost of production!! High quality raw milk from pasture fed, high quality breeds would never suffer that fate, because it has innate value, unlike the mass produced, skimmed (watered down) rubbish we get from the wholesale market government force farmers onto by banning indirect sales of raw milk.
They also won't tell you that the world's entire population could fit into the State of Texas at a lower population density than New York City, and that we could all fit onto the Isle of Wight for a massive music concert. The Malthusian population reduction crowd are simply wrong. A corrupt banking system is causing damage by concentrating capital in the hands of corporations, away from consumers, family farms and mom and pop shops, and this causes much of our environmental stresses. We the people are not the problem, we would buy local given the chance. Tho it is our fault for not rising up against banks stealing our money via fractional reserve banking, fake fiat paper money and horrendous bailouts, with their cultural & spiritual legacies.
So why does the BBC report that temperatures have not risen since 1998? Not without some Orwellian spin.
How many of you remember that the scare, in the 1970's, was that nitrogen and dust from industry would block out the sun. Then, as now, industry and farming was to be regulated and taxed, population had to be reduced, and we the people were at fault, not the political class, or the corporate monopolies.
“The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”
Kenneth Watt, Ecologist, quote from first UN Earth Day 1970.
It has been discovered now that sun-spots drive climate. Higher numbers charge the upper atmosphere, nucleating water vapor to form clouds, and water is the most potent greehouse gas. This is self-reinforcing because the trapped heat causes more water evaporation. Less sun-spots cause less clouds, more heat escapes. The BBC do not explain the mechanisms, but they report it here.
The solution is simple, educate others, and learn to say no & refuse to co-operate with the agenda. Also, UKIP are the only big political party in the UK against a climate change tax. In the USA, you must seek Ron Paul and those he recommends.
Most of us have had climate change pounded into us, through school, with images of a planet in a greehouse, through the entire media So why is it that ice caps are now growing, as reported by the Australian News? The London Telegraph reports that the world's top sea level expert denounces claims of rising sea levels, dismissing them as innacurate computer models. Paul Joseph Watson, reports, citing mainstream sources, that artic ice has grown 30% in a year and that UN scientists have, again, http://www.prisonplanet.com/ipcc-scientists-caught-producing-false-data-to-push-global-warming.htmlbeen caught lying about climate statistics. to support their policies. Meanwhile, BBC report that global temperatures haven't risen since 1998, and that they are about to fall.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[if gte vml 1]> <!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->
31,478 Scientists have, as stated by London Telegraph, covered by Congressman Dr Ron Paul in a recent congressional speech, denounced claims that man is responsible for climate change. The petition includes 9,029 people with PhD degrees, a listing of their academic specialties, and a peer-reviewed summary of the science on this subject are available at www.petitionproject.org. Signers of this petition include 3,803 with specific training in atmospheric, earth, and environmental sciences. All 31,478 of the signers have the necessary training in physics, chemistry, and mathematics to understand and evaluate the scientific data relevant to the human-caused global warming hypothesis and to the effects of human activities upon environmental quality.
------------------------------
"We've got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy." - Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation
------------------------------
For those who don't like being decieved, note the London Telegraph's report, that Polar Bears thrived during the recent warming period. Contrary to what media and school teach us, Polar Bears are the greatest swimmers of all land mammals. They like to sail ice flows and routinely swim hundreds of miles, hunting Beluga Wales in arctic water. Increased sea ice is infact more likely to close off sea hunting grounds, and cause migrations and a reduction in polar bear populations.
------------------------------
"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony... climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world." - Christine Stewart, fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment
------------------------------
The London's Guardian Newspaper, explains what is happening. They report that a "Cooling Sun brings relief to sweltering Earth", explaining that climate change is caused by the sun, and its long term, and 11yr sunspot cycle. The sun's recent reduction in activity explains ice cap growth. This follows a period when, as reported by the BBC, sunspot activity was at its highest for over 1000yrs.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
In the BBC article above, the BBC admit that the little ice age, between 1645 and 1715 was associated with a period of very low sunspot activity, referred to as the Maunder Minimum. During this period, the River Thames in London froze over to allow the wonderful frost fairs, that were written about by Jane Austen. That cold period preceeded a very warm period during the middle ages, when vines and olives were grown in Britain. We are no where near those high temperatures today, and the warming appears to have reversed, as it always does, in natural cycles. But now, in a rediculous game of doublethink and deception, our leaders now claim that we must destroy the environment to save it, and there is mounting evidence that this is already being done.
With these mainstream articles in mind, it is important to re-consider what we have been asked to do, to "save the planet". You may have been pummelled with childrens TV shows, where Superman, Spiderman, etc, etc, ad nauseum, save the planet, but have we been conditioned to be unrealistic about threats? Were we inundated by stories of superhero's in childhood, and more believable hero's in adulthood movies, to condition us to jump when told to do so, with the excuse of saving the planet? Are we captive of conditioned arrogance in a program of mass mind control?
Re-consider, that we have been asked to reduce our populations, stop driving, pro-creating, and, in the midst of a depression, pay crucifying carbon taxes to the very central banks that caused the economic crisis. Take note, that the taxing and regulation of carbon, means that governments everywhere can tax and regulate every single activity, because we are carbon based life forms. This is of course the dream of countless despots. And note, that the only way of dealing with these issues, is world government, also dreamed of by the nastiest of despots, from Alexander the Great to Hitler. So we have a duty to our children to question every word said by those pushing this agenda.
There is also an alternative. It is called freedom. For more on the free market approach to the environment, and we don't currently have free markets, check out this audio chapter of A New Liberty, by Murray N. Rothbard.
Here is a great 10min podcast on climate change that is convenient to share and provides, towards the end, a refreshing solution to the crisis:
This is a great clip from Congress on the implications of government forcing us to use mercury filled CFL lightbulbs. Just goes to show the falacy of the central planning of lightbulbs! So there goes the joke, how many governments does it take to screw in a murcury filled lightbulb? Two, China to provide cover up the dirty industrial practices required to make it profitable and the Federal Government to create the propaganda to sell it to the public.
If you enjoyed the first podcast, have a listen to this, from the Mises Institute. Here is a text version if you prefer to read.
----------
In questioning the globlal warming scare, Al Gore must be exposed as the charlitan that he is. He owns an oil company for goodness sakes and is worth over $100million. He is Getting Rich Spreading Global Warming Hysteria and, you guessed it, he has financial links with Goldman Sach's who just stole over 23 Trillion, almost half the global GDP from US taxpayers, as reported by Bloomberg. This is enough to pay off all outstanding US mortgages and consumer credit three times over. It is they who would manage any futures market in carbon. That bailout is now larger in cost than all America's wars, ever, and some big government programs combined.
For those who don't know it yet, there is no altruism in top level politics. If anybody thought Obama was "Change you can believe in" A combination of interesting mainstream and alternative media reports reveal compelling links between president Obama and a privately owned carbon trading group, which also has direct ties with elitist groups such as the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission
-----------------
And finally, take one last look at the United Nations. They, as global government, have an interest in it, which is expressed in this quote, from United Nation's "Club of Rome" think tank's document, The First Global Revolution: Al Gore is a member.
p75 "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself."
For those of you who desire a coming together of the nations, the Financial Times itself ran an Editorial stating "And Now for World Government". The article admits that world government has been developed in secret and would be dictatorial. This is how a global carbon tax will be used to reduce food and industrial production.
A great film to watch and share on this subject is Alex Jones's Fall of The Republic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU&feature=player_embedded
Also, check out Lord Monckton's recent speech about how the Copenhagen Treaty is being used to create a world government that will regulate and restrict all production, including food.
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->
Tags:
No comments yet.
You must be a member to post comments. [Become a member]
|
