In this recent video Senator Corker says the following about the effort to Audit the Federal Reserve:
"I hope that you'll do everything you can to make sure the Fed maintains its independence.
I can't imagine a greater catastrophe for our country... for folks like us (in Congress), or in the Administration, getting involved in monetary policy.
I urge you to do everything you can to stay independent, and hope that we will enable that to happen."
Whether there is any relation to his position on this issue or not it is interesting to note that some of Sen Corker's top contributors consist of PACs and employees from the following companies:
Also worth noting is that the financial / insurance sector was the largest of all the sectors giving to Sen Corker's campaign at $3 million; again no relation to his position is implied. See http://www.opensecrets.org for more details on who is backing Sen Corker and others.
The way I understand what Sens Alexander and Corker are trying to say is that they don't want to politicize monetary policy. Opening up the Fed to debate, in their minds, would allow Congress to politicize monetary policy. One of the stated reasons the Federal Reserve was created was so that monetary policy would be in the hands of an independent 3rd party away from the fleeting and fickle whims of Congress. Perhaps a good idea, except that it's unconstitutional because the Constitution does not grant Congress the authority to delegate that specific power to an external entity, especially one that is non-governmental. The Constitution also does not grant the US government the power to create (fiat) currency out of thin air.
The Constitution says: "Congress shall have the power to coin money, and regulate the value thereof... and to *fix the standard of weights and measures"
[*Setting standards for weights and measures is important so that everyone knows how much an "ounce" of gold is. Since the Constitution does not allow for fiat currency defining an "ounce" is critical to ensure that specie and bullion are measured using consistent standards.]
While Sens Corker and Alexander may be correct that Congress will not be responsible enough to handle the power to manage monetary policy, allowing that responsibility to remain pawned off to an independent, unscrutinized, unopen, unaccountable, and non-transparant, 3rd party is not the solution either. The solution is for Congress to actually become responsible and fulfill it's Constitutional obligations as spelled out in our founding document.
Matt Collins "principle before politics" Vice Chair Davidson County Republican Party Vice Chair Republican Liberty Caucus of TN Coordinator Davidson County Campaign for Liberty Talk Radio Producer 99.7 WTN Nashville Member America's Future Foundation Member Liberty on the Rocks
DISCLAIMER: Nothing I communicate is to be considered an official statement representative of any organization I belong to or am an officer of, including the Campaign for Liberty, Republican Liberty Caucus, WTN, Liberty on the Rocks, America's Future Foundation, The Tennessee Liberty Alliance, Rand Paul for Senate, or the Davidson County (Nashville) Republican Party. My opinions are my own.
According to Justin McCord, the TN Campaign for Liberty Interim State Coordinator, the staffer in Sen Corker's office handling the S601/HR1207/Audit The Fed issue is Hallie Williams. You can reach her at: hallie_williams@corker.senate.gov
The People’s natural right to defend his person, his liberty, and his property.
Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good, established by the founding fathers. Organize, create a law and support a common force to uphold, to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all, individual rights, and collective rights…
This is why the republic of United States of America has the Constitution…
The government is there to protect the people only not get involved in the health care system, banking industry, automobile industry & finance… but to be there protecting them from unscrupulous companies who run ruff shot over the citizens and consumers, via legislation but not be in the business…
Here are some interesting facts, between the 1970’s and 2004…
Because of the FED who had their hand in these corporations Banking, Automobile Industry & Financing, and Health care and Insurance Industry..
People pay more than a generation ago...1970's to 2004 this will eliminate the middle class... Move to Socialism, this was a planned attack..
25% more in taxes
76% more cost of mortgages
52% more costs on cars
Who is paying more for healthcare, the middle class lay them off, to break the cycle..
74% more cost on Health insurance
Look familiar
The Government bail out...
Banks... Mortgage
Autos... Car Industry
Health care... Health Industry & Insurance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akVL7QY0S8A&feature=channel
N ot to mention students spend 12 years in education 1970's compared to 18 years in 2004
and a shift from tax payers paying for it, to the family paying for it...
These reasons are why the middle class failures, is shifting to lower class, is Job loss, medical problem, family breakup....file for bankruptcy… Increase overhead is kills middle class…
All which means less taxes collected… You can get blood from stone or money from the unemployed.
Where is the benefit…
If I were a betting man, I would say that there is an attack on the American way of life and the destruction of the American government… But I am not going down the conspiracy road… We need to address these simple truths…
Laws designed to protect us from excess home and mortgages cost a ceiling…
Laws designed to protect us from excess car and car finance cost a ceiling….
Laws designed to protect us from excess and runaway health care costs, a ceiling…
What is the maximum the middle class can afford?
How can the variables be calculated, to penalize those corporations from taking advantage of the citizens of this country…?
Eric P.
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
—Thomas Jefferson
Campaign for Liberty is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization which neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office and claims no responsibility for the actions of individuals or groups of individuals who use the Campaign for Liberty logo or name or who may claim to act as representatives of the Campaign for Liberty without prior written consent of the Campaign for Liberty. [?]