Transparency and the Federal Reserve: A Briefing

Posted by Andrew Ward on 03/26/09 11:30 AM
Last updated 03/26/09 3:46 PM
 
[Newer: Ron Paul on CNN Tonight] [Older: Ron Paul on FoxBusiness.com 3/25]

On Wednesday, March 25th Campaign for Liberty sponsored a briefing on transparency and oversight at the Federal Reserve.  The briefing was attended by heads and representatives of various Washington-based organizations, all of whom were very concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.  The meeting opens the gateway to partnerships with over 140 groups across the political spectrum. Of particular importance was OpentheGovernment.org, who represents 40 groups on the Left.

The meeting was opened with an introduction by Campaign for Liberty's own Michael D. Ostrolenk, the primary organizer of the meeting, followed by a discourse on the Federal Reserve and HR 1207 by Paul-Martin Foss, Legislative Assistant to Congressman Ron Paul.

Mr. Foss explained that the crucial issue of Federal Reserve transparency requires an analysis of 31 USC 714, the section of US Code which establishes that the Federal Reserve may be audited by the General Accounting Office (GAO), but which establishes severe restrictions on just what the GAO may in fact audit. Essentially the only thing the GAO is allowed to audit are check-processing, currency storage and shipments, and some regulatory and bank examination functions, etc.  The most important matters, which directly affect the strength of the dollar and the health of the financial system, are immune from oversight.

The four major areas to which GAO may not have access are:

(1) transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;
(2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations
(3) transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee; or
(4) a part of a discussion or communication among or between members of the Board of Governors and officers and employees of the Federal Reserve System related to clauses (1)-(3) of this subsection.

HR 1207, The Federal Reserve Transparency Act, would eliminate these restrictions and mandate a GAO audit of the Fed to be completed by the end of 2010.

The meeting was then opened up for questions and comments by Dr. Ostrolenk.  Attendees asked Mr. Foss questions regarding congressional support for the bill (it now has over 40 co-sponsors), media attention (Ron Paul and Campaign for Liberty being at the forefront of promotion), and congressional opposition (no open opponents of the bill so far).  Joe Seehusen commented that an audit of the Fed would bring it into the light of public scrutiny, and that these "giant baby steps" would clear the way for greater freedom.

As Mr. Foss explained to the attendees of the briefing: all it takes is one audit to blow away this cloud of secrecy and wake up the American people to the Fed's malfeasance.  It is important to understand that whether you support the abolition of the Federal Reserve as Congressman Paul does, or think that the Federal Reserve has a useful role to play in management of the economy, it should concern people on both sides of the issue that the Federal Reserve is able to wield such an enormous amount of influence over monetary policy, the financial sector, and the economy in general with essentially no oversight.

---

Please help us in our efforts to bring a legitimate audit to the Federal Reserve:  click here to encourage your Representative to cosponsor HR 1207.  You can also find brochures and petitions to spread the word about HR 1207 in our fliers section.







Categories: Campaign For Liberty, Federal Legislation, Current Events, Monetary Policy
Tags: ostrolenk, foss, HR 1207, federeal reserve, audit, briefing

Showing comments 1—20 of 20

Posted 03/26/09 11:42 AM

BillNM
Carlsbad, NM
Is 1207 a one time audit?

Posted 03/26/09 11:57 AM

Andrew Ward
Arlington, VA
No. It eliminates the section of US Code the prohibits a legitimate audit of the Fed.

Posted 03/26/09 11:57 AM

Haystacks Calhoun
NEW YORK, NY
Excellent. Is there a video of this, or of a meeting providing similar information, I could watch?

Posted 03/26/09 11:59 AM

Haystacks Calhoun
NEW YORK, NY
May I also ask who attended, and if there will be follow-up informational sessions for groups in Washington? In my humble opinion this seems like a very important and positive development.

Posted 03/26/09 12:01 PM

Andrew Ward
Arlington, VA
Video was taken. We'll post it once it's available!

Posted 03/26/09 12:16 PM

BillNM
Carlsbad, NM
"No. It eliminates the section of US Code the prohibits a legitimate audit of the Fed."

I understood that. Does it then provide for periodic audits by the GAO, and if so are they annual? I am just concerned that they will still find some way to skate around full disclosure. Thx.

Posted 03/26/09 12:27 PM

jomurphy09
Santa clara, CA
Bill good point...but I don't think we would need to audit the Fed more then once in this case. One time will be enough to shake the foundations of the Fed...the debt and money manipulation is astronomical. I mean if you found bodies buried in the backyard by the billions i doubt periodic searches will be an issue...Bookem Danny!

Posted 03/26/09 12:34 PM

Andrew Ward
Arlington, VA
Yes, from what I understand these are annual audits.

Posted 03/26/09 12:51 PM

MRoCkEd
Cheshire, CT
Great! Which groups attended?

Posted 03/26/09 1:00 PM

thegavino
Fleetwood, PA
Very good to see this!

Posted 03/26/09 2:05 PM

Glenn
Cumming, GA
Wonderful!

Glad to see your work was well received by the attendees.

Maybe I'll finally get to find out who the two missing members of the Board of Governors are.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/bios/board/default.htm

Pers onally, I think they are representatives for the Morgan and Rockefeller interests.

Posted 03/26/09 2:25 PM

ifthenwouldi
Wendell, NC
Glenn,

I noticed on that site that you are expected to address board members as "The Honorable" when requested them to speak at an event.

"The Honorable?" Ha!

Posted 03/26/09 3:41 PM

Glenn
Cumming, GA
ifthenwouldi,

Hadn't noticed. The more I find aout about this evil institution, the more determined I get to see it abolished.

Posted 03/26/09 4:58 PM

tcarroll34
Brentwood, CA
I'm very proud to be a part of C4L - this is fantastic work. I couldn't think of a better what to spend my money. Cheers.

Posted 03/26/09 6:29 PM

Caleb Kinley
Hot Springs, AR
This is very encouraging.

Posted 03/26/09 9:48 PM

cowboy1165
Millville, NJ
"The briefing was attended by heads and representatives of various Washington-based organizations, all of whom were very concerned about the direction in which our country is headed."

I wonder if the CL4 will have more of an ideological impact, and bring these groups into the fold of liberty.

Posted 03/26/09 11:03 PM

RobPepe
Pennsburg, PA
Thank you C4L.

Posted 03/27/09 01:11 AM

ZCamp
Murfreesboro, TN
This is excellent. A lot of the intricate points are often left out on the internet videos and the tv interviews are always the same basic statements every time (I know I should be reading more, but with college and work i have limited time). I think that we should get Ron, or any of the senior fellows of the Mises Institute to sit down to a longer in-depth interview of one specific issue, maybe this could be a weekly thing. this may not be the place but this article inspired me...

Posted 03/27/09 10:58 AM

GusCo
Dallas, TX
When it says that there is no open opposition to this bill, it makes me wonder what opposition there possibly could be. Can anyone give me an example of a dissenting opinion they may have encountered? Everyone with whom I have discussed this bill was extremely receptive, if not down-right supportive of it.

Posted 08/05/09 7:58 PM

Sovereign
evansville, IN
Here is your audit of the fed wake up
http://cafr1.com/FRaudit.html





You must be a member to post comments.  [Become a member]

Locations of visitors to this page






"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson





Campaign for Liberty is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization which neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office and claims no
responsibility for the actions of individuals or groups of individuals who use the Campaign for Liberty logo or name or who may claim to act as
representatives of the Campaign for Liberty without prior written consent of the Campaign for Liberty. [?]