By Tom Mullen View all 30 articles by Tom Mullen Published 02/08/10  
Printer-friendly version
I must admit that as soon as I heard that The Who would be the halftime entertainment at the Super Bowl, the timeliness of what would likely be their last song immediately crossed my mind. However, that didn't lessen the impact of seeing the aging rockers belt out their classic, "Won't Get Fooled Again," although this time with more significance for America than at any time since the song was written. The enthusiastic crowd -- thousands of whom undoubtedly sport Obama/Biden bumper stickers on their vehicles -- joined Townshend and Daltrey in thunderous unison each time the line "We don't get fooled again" was sung. Ironically, the extent to which the song indicts Obama was probably lost on all, save the venerable old Englishmen themselves, who hail from a bygone era when the left was actually anti-establishment. Certainly, there has not (yet) been "fighting in the street" here in America, but most of the Obama faithful do believe that the "change" he has promised represents a "new revolution," whilst opponents certainly object to the "new constitution." I'm not sure why, since as Jay Leno quipped a few years back, we're not using the old one anyway. In any case, as Townshend says to begin the second verse, "the change it had to come." What we are changing from and what we are changing into are questions that Townshend leaves to us to answer. Fittingly, the word "change" is used five times during the song. However, the real message of the song is summed up in the last verse. "There's nothing in the street Looks any different to me And the slogans are replaced, bye the bye. And the parting on the left Is now parting on the right, And the beards have all grown
longer overnight." It is hard to believe that
these words were written in the early 1970's, as well as they describe
the Obama campaign and presidency. Certainly, the slogans have
been replaced. Obama started his presidential campaign as an anti-war
candidate. Upon receiving the Democratic nomination for president,
he subtly changed his stance from being anti-war to arguing that America
was merely "in the wrong war." Now, as he escalates the war in
Afghanistan, expands that war into Pakistan, and revives his predecessor's
antagonism towards Iran, we find that even Iraq is not such a wrong
war that we will not be leaving thirty to fifty thousand troops there
after our combat mission officially ends. Haven't we heard this
strategy before? Regarding "parting on the
left now parting on the right," the neo-conservatives that Obama
was supposedly the antithesis of during his campaign couldn't be cheering
his war-mongering any more enthusiastically. While there is obligatory
criticism by Republicans towards some of his tactical decisions or supposed
hesitation in making them, they do not fail to dutifully commend the
emperor for his overall strategic plan: more war, more debt, and —
just as in every year of the Bush administration — the largest total
DOD budget in American history (counting the actual on-budget Defense
budget, the appropriations for the active wars, and the Homeland Security
expenditures on the war formerly known as "The War on Terror"). Domestically, those who hoped
that "Change" meant an end or at least a decrease in corporate
welfare have been disappointed as well. In a classic bait-and-switch,
it turns out that his signature health care "reform" plan is nothing
more than a gift-wrapped half trillion dollars per year presented to
corporate health insurance giants, courtesy of American taxpayers who
will now have no choice but to buy their insurance. It is hard
to imagine how any self-respecting progressive can "smile and grin"
at this change, but so far they still do. The hypnotized may never
lie, but they also seem completely unable to tell when they are being
robbed blind. Of course, President Obama
did at least do something about the Bush administration's practices
of spying on its own citizens, tapping their phones, and reading their
e-mails (to keep them safe). He sent a team of lawyers to court
to defend all of these abominable practices, hoping to solidify his
legal sanction to do exactly the same thing. This shouldn't
have surprised anyone, since while still in the U.S. Senate, Obama voted
to grant immunity to telephone companies who complied with the Bush
administrations invasions. Perhaps they were expecting Obama himself
to "change" on this issue once he became president. Finally, Obama had promised
to go through every one of President Bush's executive orders and overturn
any that "trampled upon liberty." Having completed his review,
the only executive orders overturned or considered relate to stem cell
research, oil drilling on federal land, and Bush's "gag order"
on international aid organizations regarding abortion. Conspicuously
absent from the list are the infamous orders wherein Bush granted his
office vast new powers during a state of emergency, which the hysterical
Keith Olbermann quite justifiably wet himself over during several of
his anti-Bush diatribes. To summarize, let us review
what liberals/progressives said they hated about the Bush administration.
Unless memory fails, it was his immoral and unfunded wars, his preferential
treatment of Wall Street and large corporations at the expense of Main
Street, his illegal spying on and wiretapping of American citizens in
the name of security, and his assumption of dictatorial powers via executive
orders and a rubber-stamp Republican Congress. For all of those
who voted for Obama to protest and end these atrocities, the last lines
of "Won't Get Fooled Again" couldn't be more appropriate. "Meet the new boss.
Same as the old boss." Indeed he is. We have
been fooled again, and if we simply put the neo-conservative Republicans
back into office, it won't be much different the next time, either.
Isn't it time we stopped doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting a different result? Copyright © 2010 Thomas Mullen |
Also by Tom Mullen:
The Government Can't Regulate Safety (And It Shouldn't Try To) 06/28/10
Hooray for Hollywood? 06/24/10
The Three Types of Government Spending 06/14/10
What Is Limited Government? 06/03/10
The Three P's: Things Government Cannot and Should Not Do 04/15/10
View all 30 articles by Tom Mullen
Discuss this article (17 comments)
