Andrew P. Napolitano is the senior judicial analyst at the Fox News Channel and author of Dred Scott’s Revenge: A Legal History of Race and Freedom in America, A Nation of Sheep, The Constitution in Exile and Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws.
Justice Alito Was Right
By Andrew Napolitano
View all 6 articles by Andrew Napolitano
Published 01/30/10

Bookmark and Share           Printer-friendly version

Despite claims made by the president, last week's Supreme Court opinion on campaign finance specifically excludes foreign nationals and foreign-owned corporations from its ruling.

The Supreme Court issued a ruling last week on the campaign finance that is still being discussed all over the country. In fact, it was even mentioned by President Obama at Wednesday night's State of the Union address. The high court invalidated its own 20-year-old ruling -- which had upheld a one hundred-year-old statute on group political contributions -- and it also invalidated a portion of the McCain-Feingold Campaign finance law.

The 20-year-old ruling had forbidden any political spending by groups such as corporations, labor unions, and advocacy organizations (like the NRA and Planned Parenthood, for example). Ruling that all persons, individually and in groups, have the same unfettered free speech rights, the court blasted Congress for suppression of that speech. In effect, the court asked, "What part of "Congress shall make no law. . . abridging the freedom of speech" does Congress not understand?" Thus, all groups of two or more persons are free to spend their own money on any political campaigns and to mention the names of the candidates in their materials.

The court also threw out the portion of McCain-Feingold law that had prohibited persons who pool their funds or contribute to Political Action Committees (PACs), from spending those funds, directly or through PACs, in the 60 day period preceding an election. Since that 60 day period preceding the election is the most vital in any campaign, the court held that the prohibition on expenditures during that time was a violation of the free speech guaranteed to all persons, individually and in groups, by the First Amendment.


READ THE REST




Copyright © 2010 FoxNews.com

Also by Andrew Napolitano:
Can the Government Keep Us Safe?   01/12/10
What Is a Right?   12/21/09
The Case Against Military Tribunals   12/01/09
We Can't Sit Back and Allow the Loss of Our Freedoms   11/14/09
The Bipartisan Assault on Medical Liberty   11/07/09
View all 6 articles by Andrew Napolitano



Discuss this article (16 comments)


Locations of visitors to this page






"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson





Campaign for Liberty is a 501(c)4 lobbying organization which neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office and claims no
responsibility for the actions of individuals or groups of individuals who use the Campaign for Liberty logo or name or who may claim to act as
representatives of the Campaign for Liberty without prior written consent of the Campaign for Liberty. [?]